Plastikos Logo
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Who We Are
    • Plastikos Medical
    • Plastikos
    • Micro Mold
    • Leadership Team
  • What We Do
    • What We Do
    • Product Enhancement
    • Precision Mold Manufacturing
    • Medical Injection Molding
    • Advanced Plastic Processing
    • Value Added Operations
  • Our Market Focus
    • Our Market Focus
    • Medication Delivery Systems
    • Surgical Devices
    • Micro Fluidic and Gas Instruments
    • Digestive Health
    • Endoscopic Devices
    • Electronic Connectors
  • Why Us
    • Why Us
    • Engineering Horsepower
    • Industry Recognition
    • Risk Mitigation
    • Education and community outreach
    • Environmental Stewardship
  • Get In Touch
    • Get In Touch
    • Explore Erie
    • Join Our team
    • Literature and Certifications
  • News
  • 0
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Who We Are
    • Plastikos Medical
    • Plastikos
    • Micro Mold
    • Leadership Team
  • What We Do
    • What We Do
    • Product Enhancement
    • Precision Mold Manufacturing
    • Medical Injection Molding
    • Advanced Plastic Processing
    • Value Added Operations
  • Our Market Focus
    • Our Market Focus
    • Medication Delivery Systems
    • Surgical Devices
    • Micro Fluidic and Gas Instruments
    • Digestive Health
    • Endoscopic Devices
    • Electronic Connectors
  • Why Us
    • Why Us
    • Engineering Horsepower
    • Industry Recognition
    • Risk Mitigation
    • Education and community outreach
    • Environmental Stewardship
  • Get In Touch
    • Get In Touch
    • Explore Erie
    • Join Our team
    • Literature and Certifications
  • News
  • 0

Medical Device Material Selection

  Medical Device 
  Material Selection  

Material selection is a critical part of the product development cycle as it will directly impact the overall performance of the device as well as logistics, cost of goods, etc. Medical device can be especially challenging due to all the downstream testing that is often required. Also, switching materials is typically not an option once the material & device have been submitted to the FDA, so choosing the right material upfront is a key step in the process.

Our plastic engineering team at Plastikos has developed a list of questions and considerations to review when selecting your next material. Of course, our team is always open to schedule a DFM on your device should you need further input on material availability, limitations, processing, etc.

Medical Device Product Functionality

  • What will the product be exposed to (Heat, Chemicals, Weather, etc)?
  • Will the product be subjected to any type of stress or deflection?
  • Will there be any type of secondary bonding operation?
  • Is the product reusable?
  • What (if any) sterilization method will be used on the device?
  • Is optical clarity an important part of the product design?
  • Will the product require a high gloss surface finish?
  • Is there any secondary decorating or labeling required?

Material Logistics

  • Is the desired material already purchased / in your supplier base today?
  • Has a standard lead time for the material been determined?
  • Does that lead time meet your project timeline?
  • Has the raw material supplier communicated a minimum order quantity (MOQ)?
  • Is the MOQ too large to justify given the expected annual volume of the part?
  • Does the raw material supplier have or expect to have any allocation restrictions?
  • Is the specified material a custom grade & does that impact the standard delivery and availability?
  • Is there a suitable alternate grade of material that could be qualified?
  • Is the specific material available in the country in which the product will be sold?
  • And of course, what is the Cost / Pound, and will that meet your cost objectives?
medical device materials

Material Properties & Common Material Grades

Amorphous Properties
Amorphous Common Material Grades​
Amorphous Properties
Less chemical resistance than semi-crystalline material.
Prone to stress cracking and fatigue.
Low shrink rate.
Better transparency than semi-crystalline.
Density not impacted by cooling rate.
Poor wear resistance.
Amorphous Common Material Grades​
ABS – Housings – Household appliances
PC – Optical applications – Medical devices
PSU – Air & water treatment – Diagnostic Equipment, Re-Usable Devices, Sterilization
PPSU – Hot water fittings / aerospace applications – Diagnostic Equipment, Re-Usable Devices, Sterilization
COC – Optical applications – Medical devices
PEI – Eye care products – Medical devices
Semi-Crystalline Properties
Semi-Crystalline Common Material Grades
Semi-Crystalline Properties
Less prone to stress cracking/fatigue.
Higher shrink rate.
Typically, non-transparent.
Density directly impacted by cooling rate.
Good wear resistance.
Poor bonding with adhesives and solvents.
Semi-Crystalline Common Material Grades
LCP – Electronic connectors – Aerospace
HDPE – Liquid containers – Food packaging
Nylon – Automotive parts – Gears
PEEK – High wear applications – High heat applications
PBT – Miniature pumps – Electronic devices
Acetal – Gears and bearings – Conveyor systems

Material Analysis: Advantages & Disadvantages to Common Materials

Amorphous Advantages​
Amorphous Disadvantages​
Amorphous Advantages​
ABS – Able to decorate – Medium impact resistance
PC – High impact resistance – High heat resistance
PSU – Good chemical resistance – Rigid / high strength material properties
PPSU – Excellent chemical resistance / flame retardant properties – Excels in high heat & humidity environments
COC – Excellent optical clarity – Considered “inert” used for many glass replacement products
PEI – Long-term heat resistance – Good dimensional stability
Amorphous Disadvantages​
ABS – Flammable – Poor weather resistance
PC – Poor scratch resistance – Requires additives if long-term UV exposure is required
PSU – Difficult to process through hot runner systems – High mold temps required / sensitive to stress cracking
PPSU – More expensive compared to its PSU alternative – Very high mold / processing temps required
COC – High material costs
PEI – High processing temperatures – High material costs
Semi-Crystalline Advantages​
Semi-Crystalline Disadvantages
Semi-Crystalline Advantages​
LCP – Low viscosity for thin wall sections – High strength to weight ratio
HDPE – High strength to density – Excellent chemical resistance
Nylon – High wear resistance – Excellent abrasion resistance
Peek – Abrasion resistant – Excellent chemical resistance
PBT – Low moisture absorption – Good machining characteristics
Acetal – Low friction for wear applications – Good dimensional stability
Semi-Crystalline Disadvantages
LCP – Weak knit line strength – High material costs
HDPE – Low strength and hardness – Cannot be imprinted without pretreatment
Nylon – High moisture absorption – Requires UV stabilization
Peek – High material costs – Extremely difficult to process
PBT – Require UV stabilizers if used outdoors – Poor resistance to acid and bases
Acetal – Not resistant to acids – Difficult to bond

Material Analysis: Real World Applications

Intravenous Delivery

Microfluidic Device​

The current part design contains an internal flange that is extremely prone to flash or no-fill due to the knife-edge condition that is created in the design. The current raw material is also rather shear sensitive, which adds to the issue if a no-fill is detected as a leak can occur.

Plastikos has experimented with alternative material grades that may provide a suitable replacement. After several material trials, we proved one to be highly effective to minimize the no-fill condition. This provided our client with increased shot-to-shot consistency and would eliminate the need for a secondary operation on their manufacturing line.

Pain Medication Delivery

Medication Delivery Device​

The current device is made from a high temperature, specialty resin, that cost upwards of $18/lb for the raw material. As volumes grew to tens-of-millions annually, our client was investing nearly $9 million annually into raw material alone for this device.

Today, we are in the process of qualifying a new resin with very similar material properties that will reduce the raw material cost by approximately 20%, thereby saving our client over $1.8 million in raw material cost, annually.

plastikos-white
  • ISO 13485
  • ISO 9001
  • ISO 14001
  • WHO WE ARE
  • what we do
  • our market focus
  • Why us
  • Get in touch
  • news
  • Careers
Made in the USA
Subscribe on YouTube
icon-fb
icon-in
icon-ig

© Copyright Plastikos, Inc. 2024